Cleaner priorities and less operational drag.
See the work, the risk, the owner, and the next decision without chasing status.
Secure technology · Operations · AI governance
Merganser Solutions helps Denver businesses and government partners modernize operations, clean up workflows, strengthen compliance readiness, and use AI with clear guardrails. We work with local commercial, public-sector, and mission-driven teams that need systems they can operate and defend.
Denver-based Service-disabled veteran-owned small business City and state ecosystem ready
The operating model
Four disciplines, sequenced so each one earns the next: assess what is really happening, secure what must be protected, connect the work with controlled automation, and keep it under change control.
We improve the systems you already operate. No forced platform migration, no black-box automation, and no dependency on tools your team cannot maintain.
Engagement types
Start with one focused engagement or sequence several into a modernization roadmap. Each begins with what you already run, not a rip-and-replace.
Review workflows, tools, documentation, handoffs, and bottlenecks, then return a practical modernization path.
Identify safe AI opportunities for intake, reporting, drafting, research, and lead handling, with human review built in.
Organize policies, evidence, SPRS scoring support, and gap tracking aligned to NIST SP 800-171, DFARS 252.204-7012, and CMMC readiness.
Improve lifecycle workflows and requirements traceability across the EBOM, MBOM, ECO, and ECR flow.
Centralize tasks, approvals, metrics, risks, and project status into executive KPI views and operational dashboards.
Turn scattered process knowledge into procedures, work instructions, and onboarding assets with lightweight governance.
Executive outcomes
Engagements are scoped around decisions, evidence, handoffs, and recurring ownership, not slideware.
See the work, the risk, the owner, and the next decision without chasing status.
Replace scattered follow-ups with visible workflows, documented steps, and accountable lanes.
Connect readiness claims to owners, artifacts, review dates, and remediation status.
Align requirements, changes, documentation, and workflow logic before tools multiply.
Industries
The work changes with the setting. Choose a context to see the operational problem, the capability that addresses it, and the outcome you can expect.
Defense suppliers
Denver public sector
Manufacturing
Engineering teams
Small business operations
Professional services
Product organizations
CMMC readiness check
A quick self-check against practical NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS readiness signals. This is not a certification score; it is a way to identify where evidence, ownership, and remediation planning need attention first.
Readiness band
Not started 0 / 20Answer the questions to reveal the strongest next step.
01 Have you identified where CUI is stored, processed, or transmitted?
02 Do you maintain a current System Security Plan for the environment?
03 Are open control gaps tracked in a living POA&M?
04 Can each self-attested score claim point to evidence?
05 Is multi-factor authentication enforced for remote and privileged access?
06 Are audit logs collected and reviewed on a defined rhythm?
07 Do you have an incident response plan with 72-hour reporting awareness?
08 Is security awareness training current for people who touch sensitive work?
09 Are cloud and collaboration tools scoped for CUI handling rules?
10 Is ownership assigned for recurring evidence refresh and review?
What to expect
Every engagement is built to leave behind something you can operate and defend, with ownership that outlasts the project.
A Denver service-disabled veteran-owned small business, working with teams in city, state, DBE, SBE, MBE-conscious, and prime/subcontractor supplier ecosystems.
Engagement outcomes
Practical proof
Anonymized patterns and field-tested lessons from operations, readiness, AI governance, and change-control work. References and detailed examples are available when appropriate.
A. Ownership gaps. Mapping handoffs, evidence locations, decision rights, and rework loops usually exposes the first 30 days of improvement before a new tool is needed.
Proof cue: handoff map + priority matrixA. It is often gathered once instead of operated. A useful readiness tracker connects each 800-171 control to an owner, artifact, timestamp, review rhythm, and open gap.
Proof cue: control owner + artifact tracker + POA&MA. The assessment schedule can change without removing the underlying obligation. NIST 800-171, DFARS 7012, SPRS scoring, and incident-response expectations still need a defensible operating model.
Proof cue: what changed / what still applies matrixA. It has to move. A practical POA&M ties each gap to a control, owner, target date, status, evidence need, and closure approval instead of becoming a static list.
Proof cue: gap aging + closure evidenceA. With boundaries, not prompts. The practical first move is an AI inventory: tools in use, data entering them, review needs, and required human approvals.
Proof cue: AI inventory + review gatesA. Drift between design, approval, purchasing, and build reality. Clarifying EBOM, MBOM, ECR, ECO, supplier, and quality handoffs keeps the flow intact.
Proof cue: change-flow traceabilityStart here
Tell us what's slowing the work down, what systems are in place, and what should improve first. Bring a technical problem, an upcoming city or state opportunity, a subcontracting need, or a modernization goal.
Prefer email? moses@merganser.tech