Merganser Solutions Start an assessment

Secure technology · Operations · AI governance

Make modern work easier to trust.

Merganser Solutions helps Denver businesses and government partners modernize operations, clean up workflows, strengthen compliance readiness, and use AI with clear guardrails. We work with local commercial, public-sector, and mission-driven teams that need systems they can operate and defend.

Denver-based Service-disabled veteran-owned small business City and state ecosystem ready

The operating model

From scattered work to a connected decision system.

Four disciplines, sequenced so each one earns the next: assess what is really happening, secure what must be protected, connect the work with controlled automation, and keep it under change control.

We improve the systems you already operate. No forced platform migration, no black-box automation, and no dependency on tools your team cannot maintain.

  1. 1AssessPMP-informed scope, ROMB review, and an ROI baseline.
  2. 2SecureCMMC 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 readiness.
  3. 3ConnectHuman-in-the-loop AI workflows.
  4. 4ControlPLM, SOPs, and change management.

Engagement types

Packaged work for organizations that need cleaner systems.

Start with one focused engagement or sequence several into a modernization roadmap. Each begins with what you already run, not a rip-and-replace.

Executive outcomes

The work is measured by what leaders can operate.

Engagements are scoped around decisions, evidence, handoffs, and recurring ownership, not slideware.

Owners / executives

Cleaner priorities and less operational drag.

See the work, the risk, the owner, and the next decision without chasing status.

Operations leaders

Fewer handoff failures.

Replace scattered follow-ups with visible workflows, documented steps, and accountable lanes.

Compliance / security

Evidence that can be defended.

Connect readiness claims to owners, artifacts, review dates, and remediation status.

Technical teams

Less rework and clearer traceability.

Align requirements, changes, documentation, and workflow logic before tools multiply.

Industries

Built for public-sector, regulated, technical, and operations-heavy teams.

The work changes with the setting. Choose a context to see the operational problem, the capability that addresses it, and the outcome you can expect.

Defense suppliers

Compliance that can prove itself.

The challenge
CMMC timelines can shift, but NIST 800-171, DFARS 7012, SPRS scoring, self-attestation, and incident reporting still put evidence ownership on the supplier.
How we help
Map controls to owners, stand up an evidence tracker, connect gaps to a living POA&M, and make each readiness claim traceable to artifacts.
The outcome
A defensible, current picture of readiness — one that supports self-assessment today and formal assessment when the mandate settles.
Discuss a readiness engagement

CMMC readiness check

Score the work before the assessment does.

A quick self-check against practical NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS readiness signals. This is not a certification score; it is a way to identify where evidence, ownership, and remediation planning need attention first.

Readiness band

Not started 0 / 20

Answer the questions to reveal the strongest next step.

  1. 01 Have you identified where CUI is stored, processed, or transmitted?

  2. 02 Do you maintain a current System Security Plan for the environment?

  3. 03 Are open control gaps tracked in a living POA&M?

  4. 04 Can each self-attested score claim point to evidence?

  5. 05 Is multi-factor authentication enforced for remote and privileged access?

  6. 06 Are audit logs collected and reviewed on a defined rhythm?

  7. 07 Do you have an incident response plan with 72-hour reporting awareness?

  8. 08 Is security awareness training current for people who touch sensitive work?

  9. 09 Are cloud and collaboration tools scoped for CUI handling rules?

  10. 10 Is ownership assigned for recurring evidence refresh and review?

What to expect

Measurable improvement, not more paperwork.

Every engagement is built to leave behind something you can operate and defend, with ownership that outlasts the project.

A Denver service-disabled veteran-owned small business, working with teams in city, state, DBE, SBE, MBE-conscious, and prime/subcontractor supplier ecosystems.

Practical proof

What we look for first.

Anonymized patterns and field-tested lessons from operations, readiness, AI governance, and change-control work. References and detailed examples are available when appropriate.

Gap analysis

Q. What usually slows the work down first?

A. Ownership gaps. Mapping handoffs, evidence locations, decision rights, and rework loops usually exposes the first 30 days of improvement before a new tool is needed.

Proof cue: handoff map + priority matrix
CMMC readiness

Q. Why does evidence get hard to manage?

A. It is often gathered once instead of operated. A useful readiness tracker connects each 800-171 control to an owner, artifact, timestamp, review rhythm, and open gap.

Proof cue: control owner + artifact tracker + POA&M
Framework shift

Q. What if the CMMC deadline moves?

A. The assessment schedule can change without removing the underlying obligation. NIST 800-171, DFARS 7012, SPRS scoring, and incident-response expectations still need a defensible operating model.

Proof cue: what changed / what still applies matrix
POA&M lifecycle

Q. What makes a plan of action useful?

A. It has to move. A practical POA&M ties each gap to a control, owner, target date, status, evidence need, and closure approval instead of becoming a static list.

Proof cue: gap aging + closure evidence
AI governance

Q. Where should AI automation start?

A. With boundaries, not prompts. The practical first move is an AI inventory: tools in use, data entering them, review needs, and required human approvals.

Proof cue: AI inventory + review gates
PLM & change control

Q. What makes change control break down?

A. Drift between design, approval, purchasing, and build reality. Clarifying EBOM, MBOM, ECR, ECO, supplier, and quality handoffs keeps the flow intact.

Proof cue: change-flow traceability

Start here

Bring us the operational challenge.

Tell us what's slowing the work down, what systems are in place, and what should improve first. Bring a technical problem, an upcoming city or state opportunity, a subcontracting need, or a modernization goal.

Prefer email? moses@merganser.tech

A few sentences are enough: current tools, pain points, compliance needs, desired outcome, or what you want to cover during the call.